In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a proposed redevelopment project along Veterans Memorial Highway, which aims to transform a blighted commercial property into a residential community. The initial plan included preserving a corner commercial building while adding townhomes to address the growing need for affordable housing, particularly the \"missing middle\" housing type. However, concerns were raised regarding the existing commercial saturation in the area, prompting a reevaluation of the proposal to potentially convert the entire site to residential use.

The revised site plan presented features 42 townhomes arranged around a central green space, with no access to Burris Road, which has been identified as problematic due to traffic and visibility issues. The traffic engineer's study suggested that access from Veterans Memorial would be more suitable, a point of agreement among various stakeholders, including the Mableton Improvement Coalition, which expressed support for the residential development but raised concerns about the design quality and community engagement.

Opposition from the Mableton Improvement Coalition highlighted the need for a more imaginative design, criticizing the proposed townhomes as \"cookie-cutter\" and lacking architectural interest. They emphasized that while the area requires new housing, the current proposal does not meet the community's expectations for quality and aesthetics. Additionally, concerns were voiced about the absence of rental restrictions, maintenance provisions for private streets, and the adequacy of stormwater management.

The Cobb Department of Transportation (DOT) also weighed in, noting deficiencies in the traffic study and recommending a deceleration lane for safer access to Veterans Memorial. They echoed the need for widening Burris Road to meet current standards, further complicating the proposal.

As the meeting progressed, the applicant expressed willingness to engage in further dialogue with the community and consider rental restrictions and road maintenance reserves. However, the overall sentiment among community representatives remained cautious, with calls for a more thorough design review and better communication moving forward.

The staff recommendation suggested a reduction in the proposed density from RM-8 to RA-5, which would yield fewer units and align more closely with the surrounding residential areas. The outcome of this proposal remains uncertain as discussions continue, reflecting the community's desire for a development that enhances the neighborhood while addressing housing needs.