In a recent government meeting, city officials discussed a proposed residential development that has sparked considerable debate among commission members and community stakeholders. The project, which has undergone several revisions since its initial proposal in 2022, now includes a five-story building with an increase of 43 units compared to earlier plans.

Commissioner Chris expressed concerns about the height and density of the new design, questioning whether the additional story and units truly fit the neighborhood's character. He highlighted that the community had previously voiced opposition to a four-story building, raising doubts about the rationale behind the latest changes. \"I think it creates a canyon,\" he remarked, emphasizing the need for developments to align with the existing environment.

Another commissioner, Gary, acknowledged the evolution of the project, noting improvements in parking and amenities that have made the proposal more viable. He pointed out that the elimination of commercial space has allowed for increased parking capacity, which he believes is essential for the density being proposed. \"They've added a lot of underground parking,\" he stated, indicating that this adjustment addresses previous concerns about insufficient parking.

The discussion also touched on water management issues, with officials assuring that the development would adhere to both city and county regulations regarding stormwater runoff. They emphasized that the project includes a substantial underground storage system designed to mitigate flooding concerns in the area.

As the meeting progressed, several commissioners expressed a willingness to support the project, citing its potential benefits to the community and the responsiveness of the developers to feedback. However, the tension surrounding the building's height and density remains a focal point of contention, reflecting broader concerns about urban development and its impact on local neighborhoods.

The commission is expected to continue deliberating on the proposal, weighing the need for housing against the preservation of community character and infrastructure challenges.