During a recent Titusville City Council meeting, the first reading of two ordinances related to a proposed small-scale comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning for a development project drew significant public concern. The ordinances, identified as SSA number 3 2022 and CPA number 2 2024, aim to change the land use designation and zoning classification for approximately 25.9 acres located at 8225 Windover Way from commercial and conservation to a planned unit development (PUD).

The Planning and Zoning Commission had previously recommended denial of the project, citing concerns over its compatibility with the surrounding residential community of Windover Farms, which consists of over 600 homes. Residents expressed strong opposition, arguing that the proposed four-story buildings would disrupt the rural character of their neighborhood and lead to increased traffic on local roads not designed to handle such volumes.

Public testimony highlighted several key issues, including the adequacy of traffic studies conducted by the developer. Many residents criticized the studies for failing to account for significant traffic patterns and potential impacts on local roads, particularly Windover Way, which is classified as a local road rather than an arterial or collector road. Speakers pointed out that the proposed access points for the development would funnel additional traffic onto Windover Way, exacerbating existing congestion and safety concerns.

Residents also raised questions about the appropriateness of converting commercial land to high-density residential use, arguing that the city already has sufficient residential capacity to meet future growth needs. They emphasized the importance of maintaining commercial zoning to support local businesses and economic development.

The council clarified that this meeting was only the first reading of the ordinances, meaning no votes or decisions would be made at this time. However, the strong community response indicates that the upcoming public hearing will likely see continued opposition to the proposed development. The council is expected to revisit the matter in future meetings, where further discussions and potential votes will take place.