Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Residents demand control over Green Bridge Project decisions

July 09, 2024 | Culpeper County, Virginia



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Residents demand control over Green Bridge Project decisions
During a recent government meeting, community concerns regarding the proposed Green Bridge Project in Cullman County took center stage. Betty Myers, a local resident, emphasized that as the host community, Cullman County should have a leading role in directing the project rather than being dictated to by Greenridge and its affiliates. Myers expressed her dissatisfaction with the changes submitted to the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) by Greenridge, stating that many residents, including herself, do not agree with these modifications.

Myers highlighted widespread negativity surrounding Greenridge, citing issues such as odor, traffic, and health concerns that have been reported by residents across the United States and Canada. She referenced a recent article that criticized GFL, the parent company of Greenridge, for its operational losses despite significant revenues exceeding $7.5 billion in 2023. Myers questioned the suitability of Greenridge for Cumberland County, noting that the company’s alignment with the county's comprehensive plan remains unaddressed.

Additionally, Myers raised concerns about the financial compensation of Greenridge's owner, who reportedly received over $68 million in 2023, including substantial bonuses and stock awards. She questioned whether such a company would be beneficial for the community, urging the board to consider the implications of the proposed land deal that many residents were unaware of.

The meeting concluded with a reminder from officials that the proceedings were for the benefit of the community, encouraging residents to remain engaged in local governance. The discussions reflect ongoing tensions between community interests and corporate developments, underscoring the need for transparency and local input in significant projects affecting the area.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Virginia articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI