In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the relocation of an Innovative Alternative (IA) septic system in a tight tank district, raising questions about compliance with local regulations and the implications for new construction.

The board reviewed an application to relocate an existing IA system, which is currently functioning and permitted for a four-bedroom design, despite the property being used as a two-bedroom house. The applicant argued that the existing system, installed in 2006, should be grandfathered under state regulations, allowing for the proposed development without the need for a tight tank, which is typically mandated for new constructions in the area.

Board members expressed confusion regarding the necessity of replacing a functioning system, with some advocating for tighter regulations to ensure environmental protection. The discussion highlighted the ambiguity in current regulations, particularly the distinction between systems that require replacement versus those that do not. The board noted that while the regulations allow for the possibility of requiring a tight tank, they do not apply in this case since the existing IA system is operational.

The applicant clarified that the intention behind relocating the system is to accommodate a new structure on the property, which necessitates moving the septic system. The proposed plan aims to comply with Title 5 regulations while improving the overall wastewater management situation.

Concerns were raised about potential future increases in bedroom capacity, with board members suggesting that any approval should include restrictions to prevent the property from exceeding the four-bedroom limit. The applicant indicated a willingness to agree to such conditions.

As the meeting concluded, it became evident that the board would need to revisit and potentially revise regulations governing septic systems in tight tank districts to address the complexities of new construction and existing systems. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future developments in similar areas, balancing the need for compliance with environmental standards and the rights of property owners.