During a recent government meeting, Judge Wise faced intense scrutiny regarding her past writings and opinions on gender laws and judicial conduct. The session, characterized by pointed questions from Senator Kennedy, focused on several articles authored by Wise, including one from Time Magazine that criticized gender laws as being \"at odds with science.\" Wise clarified that she did not select the title of the article, which was perceived as misleading.

Senator Kennedy pressed Wise on her views regarding transgender issues, questioning her integrity and consistency in her judicial philosophy. He referenced her statements about the complexities of sex and gender, emphasizing her assertion that \"sex has countless natural permutations.\" Wise maintained that her views align with medical science and the standards for expert testimony in court.

The discussion also touched on Wise's involvement with Girls Inc., a nonprofit organization, where she served on the board until recently. Kennedy highlighted the organization's inclusive definition of \"girls,\" which encompasses a broad spectrum of gender identities. Wise claimed unfamiliarity with this policy, despite her financial contributions to the organization.

As the questioning continued, Wise reiterated her commitment to uphold the law above personal beliefs, asserting that her judicial record over the past decade reflects this principle. The meeting concluded with Senator Hirono addressing other nominees, ensuring a thorough vetting process for all candidates. The proceedings underscore the ongoing debate surrounding gender identity and the role of personal beliefs in judicial decision-making.