During a recent government meeting, discussions centered around judicial nominee Judge Wise's approach to decision-making and her views on gender definitions, particularly in relation to the organization Girls Inc.

Judge Wise emphasized her commitment to fairness and objectivity in her judicial role, stating that her decisions are based strictly on the law, irrespective of personal beliefs. This assertion was met with approval from committee members, who expressed confidence in her ability to apply the law consistently.

Senator Blackburn raised questions regarding Judge Wise's past involvement with Girls Inc., specifically referencing the organization's definition of \"girls\" as inclusive of various gender identities. When pressed for her own definition, Judge Wise indicated that she had not previously considered the term in the context presented by the organization, suggesting a more traditional view based on biological sex assigned at birth.

The conversation shifted to the topic of Title IX and the participation of transgender students in school sports. Judge Wise stated that she had no opinion on whether the Department of Education should issue rules regarding sex equity in athletics, distancing herself from the advocacy positions of Girls Inc. Blackburn noted her disagreement with Judge Wise's stance, highlighting the ongoing debate surrounding gender identity and sports participation.

The meeting underscored the complexities of defining gender in contemporary society and the implications for legal frameworks, particularly in educational settings.