In a recent government meeting, a proposal for a third dormer on a historic property faced significant opposition from board members, ultimately leading to a unanimous decision to deny the application. The discussions highlighted concerns about the architectural integrity of the building and its historical significance.

Several members expressed that the addition of a third dormer would be excessive and inappropriate, arguing that it would detract from the building's historic character. One member noted that having three dormers in a row would overwhelm the facade and disrupt the visual harmony of the structure. The sentiment was echoed by others who emphasized that the existing two dormers were already atypical for the historic style of the house.

The applicant, Mr. Webster, defended the proposal as a means to provide light and ventilation to an upper room, suggesting that it was the simplest solution. However, board members were not convinced, with one stating that the addition would create a \"noisier\" appearance that detracted from the building's quiet historic charm.

As the discussion progressed, the board considered various options, including holding the application for revisions or outright denial. Ultimately, a motion was made to deny the application based on its inconsistency with the building's historical context and the potential for overburdening the facade. The motion was supported unanimously, reflecting a collective commitment to preserving the architectural integrity of the area.

This decision underscores the ongoing challenges faced by property owners seeking to modify historic structures, as local boards prioritize maintaining the character and history of their communities.