In a recent government meeting, officials engaged in a robust discussion regarding short-term rentals (STRs) on Nantucket, focusing on the implications of a specific case involving local property owners, the Grapes. The dialogue highlighted differing perspectives on the customary use of properties for rentals and the legal definitions surrounding primary residences.

Several board members defended the Grapes' actions, asserting that their rental practices align with Nantucket's historical norms. One member emphasized that STRs, often viewed negatively, are simply a modern term for what has traditionally been known as rentals. They argued that the use of the property for short-term rentals is not only customary but also reflects the intentions of many local homeowners.

The conversation also touched on the complexities of defining a primary residence, with members debating whether to consider the entire year or just the summer rental season when evaluating occupancy. One official suggested that the board should focus on the specific case at hand rather than broader implications, while another raised concerns about the potential for overreach in monitoring residents' usage of their properties.

The meeting underscored the tension between maintaining local traditions and adapting to contemporary rental practices, with officials acknowledging the need for clarity in zoning laws. As the board navigates these discussions, the outcome may set important precedents for how short-term rentals are regulated in Nantucket moving forward.