During a recent government meeting, discussions centered on the Madeline case and the complexities surrounding accessory use definitions in Nantucket. The conversation highlighted the absence of a clear definition for short-term rentals in the local bylaws, which has led to confusion regarding the classification of residential properties.

Legal representatives emphasized the importance of a practical standard for determining when a dwelling is considered to be in use. A suggestion was made that if a property is rented for more than 183 days a year, it should be classified as a predominant rental use. This proposal aims to provide clarity in a situation where the interpretation of \"used or to be used\" has significant implications for property owners and the community.

The board members were encouraged to consider the unique circumstances of individual properties, as the nature of second home ownership and rental practices can vary widely across Nantucket. The discussion also touched on the need for a thorough examination of factual submissions related to customary practices, which could inform the board's decision-making process.

As the meeting progressed, it became clear that the board might need additional sessions to address any unresolved factual issues before reaching a conclusion. The incorporation of existing records and affidavits was suggested to aid in making informed findings.

Overall, the meeting underscored the ongoing challenges faced by Nantucket in regulating short-term rentals and the necessity for clear definitions and standards to guide future decisions.