In a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding proposed changes to the county's redistricting process, particularly a last-minute proposal introduced by attorney Stan Long. The League of Women Voters and several community members voiced strong opposition to this proposal, arguing that it undermines the transparency and public trust established by the Charter Review Committee's year-long process.

The League emphasized its commitment to fair representation and public participation in redistricting, stating that the proposed charter change does not meet the standards necessary for effective governance. They urged the commissioners to uphold the recommendations made by the Charter Review Committee, which had been developed through extensive public input and research.

Community members echoed these sentiments, expressing alarm over the perceived lack of public review associated with Long's proposal. Critics described the proposal as a potential form of gerrymandering, which could distort democratic principles by manipulating district boundaries to favor specific political outcomes. They stressed the importance of maintaining a transparent process that respects the hard work of the Charter Review Committee and encourages broad community involvement.

Several speakers highlighted the risks of diminishing public trust in government institutions if the proposal were to be considered without proper vetting. They called for a more inclusive approach, suggesting that any new proposals should undergo thorough public scrutiny and discussion before being placed on the ballot.

Commissioners acknowledged the diverse perspectives presented during the public comment period, with some defending the right of citizens to propose amendments while others expressed concern about the implications of bypassing established processes. The meeting underscored the ongoing debate over governance, representation, and the importance of community engagement in shaping local policies.