Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Residents clash over street vacation proposal in Allentown

July 09, 2024 | Allentown City, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Residents clash over street vacation proposal in Allentown
In a recent government meeting, the Planning Commission discussed a petition for the vacation of portions of South Roor Street and Hill Street, proposed by local residents Jose Cartagena and Elizabeth Rivera. The application aims to vacate these unimproved streets, which have never been open to the public, and has garnered support from several property owners in the vicinity, although two property owners have yet to respond.

Cartagena, who has lived in the area for eight years, expressed his commitment to maintaining the streets, stating that he has invested significant effort and resources into their upkeep. He highlighted the challenges he faced, including damage to his equipment from debris left by neighbors. Cartagena emphasized his desire to beautify the area and improve safety for both residents and pedestrians.

The Bureau of Engineering and Public Works have reviewed the petition and do not object to the vacation, provided that utility easements are retained for existing utilities. Utility companies, including PPL and Verizon, have indicated that easements will be necessary for their access. The commission noted that while they sympathize with Cartagena's position regarding the potential for more than a 50% claim to the vacated land, their role is limited to determining the feasibility of the vacation itself.

During the meeting, concerns were raised by another resident regarding access to a rear gate on their property, which has not been used but may serve as an emergency exit. The resident expressed the importance of maintaining access for safety reasons.

The commission concluded the discussion by acknowledging the complexities involved in the petition and the need for further deliberation before making a final decision. The matter will be forwarded to the city council for further consideration, with all advisory comments from the planning commission included in the report.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting