Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

City Commission Considers Controversial Storage Facility Proposal

July 31, 2024 | Carson City, Ormsby County, Nevada



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City Commission Considers Controversial Storage Facility Proposal
In a recent government meeting, the Planning Commission discussed a proposal for a special use permit to transform the former Kmart building at 3456 North Carson Street into a personal storage retail office complex. The project, presented by architect Jeff Grama on behalf of owner Michael Hariri, aims to include both indoor and outdoor storage for recreational vehicles and boats.

The proposed facility will feature approximately 119,000 square feet of indoor personal storage, 21,000 square feet dedicated to RV and boat storage, and an additional 37,899 square feet for retail or office use. Outdoor storage will encompass around 53,000 square feet, situated on the west side of the building.

Due to the existing building's height of 24 feet, which exceeds the 14-foot limit for storage facilities adjacent to residential areas, the applicant is also seeking a height variance. The project complies with the Carson City Municipal Code, which allows personal storage facilities in the retail commercial zoning district, contingent upon obtaining a special use permit.

The proposal has garnered mixed public feedback, with some residents expressing concerns about the facility's impact on the neighborhood, including issues related to existing condensers and the need for more residential developments in the area. Others have voiced support for the project. The commission noted that the city is not responsible for enforcing a reciprocal easement and operation agreement affecting the property, emphasizing that the review will focus on the project's merits.

Staff has recommended approval of the special use permit, citing that all necessary findings have been met. The commission will continue to evaluate the proposal, considering both community concerns and the potential benefits of repurposing the existing structure.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting