In a recent government meeting, community members voiced significant concerns regarding a proposed library project in Plymouth, which carries an estimated cost of $14 million. The discussions highlighted a perceived lack of transparency and public engagement surrounding the project, with several residents calling for a referendum to allow the entire community to vote on the proposal.

One speaker emphasized the town's modest population growth of 0.27% per year, arguing that reliance on a large grant for the project could jeopardize economic stability. They urged the council to prioritize community input and ensure that all citizens have the opportunity to participate in the decision-making process.

Sandra Meyer, another resident, expressed frustration over the limited information available to the public, stating that she only learned about the project a week prior to the meeting. She criticized the library's management for neglecting maintenance and questioned the rationale behind declaring the existing elevator beyond its life expectancy. Meyer suggested that the council should explore reorganizing the library's space rather than pursuing an expensive expansion.

Christine White echoed these sentiments, highlighting that only 6.5% of the community had provided feedback through surveys, which she deemed insufficient for a project of this magnitude. She urged for improved communication and marketing efforts to better inform residents about the library's needs and the proposed changes.

Bridal Miller, a long-time resident, defended the library committee's efforts, noting that meetings were open to the public and well-attended. However, she acknowledged the need for better publicity to ensure broader community involvement.

Neil Wogenberg, representing local businesses, expressed concern that the library's expansion could negatively impact operations in the area, urging the council to consider the implications for local commerce.

The meeting concluded with a commitment from council members to listen to community feedback and consider the various perspectives shared. As the project moves forward, the call for increased transparency and public involvement remains a central theme among residents.