During a recent Berkeley City Council meeting, community members voiced strong opinions regarding a proposed ballot measure aimed at capping annual rent increases at 3%. The discussions highlighted a divide between landlords and tenants, with speakers presenting contrasting views on the implications of the measure.

Lior Birey, a housing provider and resident of District 5, urged the council to reject the proposal, arguing that it did not qualify for the ballot due to insufficient voter signatures. He expressed concern that the measure would hinder small landlords from maintaining and increasing housing stock, ultimately harming the rental market.

Conversely, Agatha, a senior citizen and landlord, expressed gratitude for the removal of certain provisions from the measure but criticized the proposed cap on rent increases. She argued that the 3% limit fails to keep pace with rising costs for utilities and repairs, suggesting that landlords should be allowed to raise rents by the previously proposed 7%.

Allison, another speaker, emphasized the need for fairness in the treatment of landlords, likening the council's actions to unjust practices that would not be tolerated in tenant-landlord relationships. She called for a more equitable approach to regulations affecting property owners.

David Charest raised concerns about the upcoming audit of the rent board, scheduled for 2025, suggesting that voters should have access to the audit's findings before making decisions on the ballot measure. He criticized the rent board's communication and billing practices, likening them to harassment.

Michelle Haley echoed sentiments of frustration over increasing regulations, stating that the complexities of the current system are overwhelming for small landlords. She urged the council to engage property owners in discussions about potential changes.

The meeting concluded with Karen Shenoy from the Bridge Association of Realtors expressing disappointment in the behavior of the rent board's supporters, particularly regarding their failed signature gathering efforts.

As the council deliberates on the proposed measure, the discussions reflect ongoing tensions in Berkeley's housing landscape, highlighting the need for balanced solutions that consider the interests of both tenants and landlords.