In a significant development regarding the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, reports indicate that both parties have reached a framework for a new ceasefire and hostage deal following negotiations in Cairo and Doha. According to a Washington Post report, a senior U.S. official confirmed that the details of the agreement are currently being negotiated, although a final deal may not be imminent.

This announcement comes amid escalating Israeli military operations in Gaza, with Israel ordering civilians in Gaza City to evacuate, a move criticized by the Israeli human rights group Edselam as \"absolute madness.\" The situation remains dire, with reports of over 38,000 deaths in Gaza, including many children, and significant humanitarian concerns.

Israeli negotiators recently returned from Doha, where they met with officials from Egypt, Qatar, and the U.S., including CIA Director William Burns and Mossad chief David Barnea. Daniel Levy, president of the U.S. Middle East Project and former Israeli peace negotiator, outlined a proposed three-phase deal. The initial phase would involve a withdrawal of Israeli troops from large parts of Gaza, the release of hostages, and increased humanitarian access. Subsequent phases would focus on further prisoner releases and rehabilitation efforts.

Levy emphasized the uncertainty surrounding the commitment to a permanent ceasefire, noting that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has expressed intentions to continue military operations until all objectives are met. This stance has faced growing opposition within Israel, particularly from families of hostages and military officials who advocate for a ceasefire to facilitate negotiations.

The political landscape in Israel is increasingly fraught, with protests against Netanyahu's approach gaining momentum. Critics argue that his upcoming address to Congress could embolden hardline supporters and hinder prospects for a ceasefire. Prominent Israeli figures have called for Congress to disinvite Netanyahu, asserting that his presence would undermine the urgency for a resolution.

As the situation evolves, the Israeli military's public dissent regarding the war's direction highlights a critical juncture in the conflict. With no clear political plan in place, military leaders are advocating for a shift in strategy, recognizing the challenges of achieving the stated goals against Hamas.

The international community watches closely as the potential for a ceasefire hangs in the balance, with humanitarian conditions in Gaza deteriorating and the urgency for a resolution becoming increasingly apparent.