In a recent city council meeting, members engaged in a critical discussion regarding a resolution aimed at affirming the city’s values towards unhoused individuals. The resolution, which does not alter existing policies, was crafted in close consultation with the city attorney to ensure it does not lead to any changes in policy. It explicitly states that unhoused individuals are not less safe than they were two weeks prior, reflecting the council's commitment to protecting this vulnerable population.

Council members expressed a sense of urgency in moving forward with the resolution, emphasizing the need for certainty for the public. A timeline was proposed, indicating that an analysis related to the resolution would be ready for a closed session within the next two weeks.

During the voting process, the substitute motion to approve the resolution as written faced opposition, ultimately failing. However, the main motion received majority support, with several council members voting in favor, while a few abstained or voted against it.

The meeting concluded with a motion to suspend the rules and adjourn, indicating a swift end to the session after the resolution's passage. This discussion highlights the council's ongoing efforts to address homelessness and the complexities involved in policy-making surrounding this critical issue.