In a recent city council meeting, discussions centered around a preliminary application submitted by PCB for the development of 455 affordable and market-rate housing units. The application, acknowledged by city staff under Senate Bill 330, restricts the city from imposing changes or denying the project under most circumstances. PCB representatives expressed concerns over insufficient communication from city staff regarding the project's status and compliance with various laws, including CEQA and federal and state takings law.

Chase Preciado, representing the Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER), raised alarms about potential adverse impacts on air quality and human health associated with the project. He cited an air quality expert's findings that the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) underestimated emissions and failed to implement feasible mitigation measures. Preciado urged the council to deny the project and require a revised EIR to address these shortcomings.

During the meeting, council members sought clarification on whether the project would require union labor, confirming that it is a prevailing wage project. The city manager acknowledged the need for compliance with labor agreements, similar to previous public projects.

The council also discussed the broader context of housing development in the area, emphasizing the need for diverse housing types, including affordable options, in line with state requirements. The city manager highlighted the importance of transit-oriented development to enhance infrastructure and accessibility.

As the meeting concluded, the council faced the challenge of balancing community concerns about environmental impacts with the pressing need for affordable housing in the region.