During a recent government meeting in Signal Mountain, community members expressed strong opinions regarding a controversial sign at the local community center, the MAC. The sign, which has been described as inclusive for transgender individuals, has sparked a heated debate among residents about its appropriateness and representation of the community's values.

Katie McFarland, a local resident, voiced her concerns, stating that while she supports unisex facilities, she believes the current sign is inappropriate and divisive. She emphasized that the majority of the community would prefer a straightforward label, such as \"toilet,\" to foster inclusivity without controversy.

Alexandra Kitchell echoed McFarland's sentiments, arguing that as a taxpayer, she feels uncomfortable with the sign's presence. She described it as unnecessary and less inclusive than a simple restroom designation, suggesting that it could alienate some community members.

David Campbell approached the issue from a business perspective, questioning the sign's alignment with the majority opinion in Signal Mountain. He warned that it could deter families from using the facility, potentially impacting its patronage.

The discussions highlighted a divide within the community, with some advocating for a more traditional approach to signage while others support the inclusive message intended by the current sign. The meeting underscored the complexities of balancing community values and inclusivity in public spaces, leaving local leaders to consider the implications of their decisions moving forward.