During a recent city council meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the proposed lease versus sale of the Oakland Coliseum site. Advocates for public land preservation emphasized their preference for leasing the site, arguing that public land should remain in public hands. This stance aligns with a 2018 resolution by the city, which expressed a similar preference.

Ruby Acevedo, a senior staff attorney with Communities For A Better Environment, voiced serious objections to the council's handling of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. She criticized the council for failing to provide necessary public engagement and information regarding the project, which she argued constitutes a violation of CEQA. Acevedo highlighted that local residents, particularly those in East Oakland, have not been informed about potential environmental impacts of the project, calling for transparency and public participation in the decision-making process.

Concerns about transparency were echoed by other council members, who questioned the decision to negotiate the final sale agreement in closed sessions, limiting public input. Critics argued that this lack of transparency undermines trust in the council's management of the sale and raises questions about the rationale behind such an approach. The meeting underscored a growing demand for accountability and public involvement in significant municipal decisions, particularly those affecting community resources.