In a recent San Diego City Council meeting, council members addressed a significant issue regarding public testimony during ceremonial presentations, specifically in relation to a proclamation honoring former police chief David Nizlai. The discussion was prompted by allegations that the council violated the Ralph M. Brown Act by failing to allow public testimony during the June 4, 2024, meeting when the proclamation was presented.

Assistant City Attorney Leslie Fitzgerald presented a proposed resolution aimed at reaffirming the council's commitment to the Brown Act. The resolution seeks to ensure that public testimony will be allowed during future presentations of proclamations, thereby mitigating potential legal exposure for the city. Fitzgerald clarified that the resolution is not an admission of wrongdoing but a proactive measure to prevent unnecessary litigation.

Public comments during the meeting reflected strong sentiments regarding the council's handling of public input. Several speakers criticized the council for perceived violations of the Brown Act, expressing concerns about the timing of meeting announcements and the elimination of virtual public testimony options. Lorrie Saldanha, one of the speakers, accused the council of cynicism and called for a genuine commitment to public engagement, particularly for those unable to attend meetings in person.

Other speakers echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing the importance of allowing public comment and the need for the council to adhere to established procedures. They urged the council to reconsider any proposals that would limit virtual testimony, citing accessibility issues for many residents.

The council's resolution is expected to provide clarity and assurance to the public regarding their rights to participate in future meetings, as the city navigates the complexities of compliance with the Brown Act. The discussions highlighted ongoing tensions between council operations and public expectations for transparency and engagement in local governance.