Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

City moves to seize land for Coastal Rail Trail project

July 15, 2024 | San Diego City, San Diego County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City moves to seize land for Coastal Rail Trail project
In a recent city council meeting, officials discussed the adoption of a resolution of necessity to initiate the eminent domain process for the Coastal Rail Trail project, a significant infrastructure initiative aimed at enhancing bicycle connectivity in the region. The project, which will create a one-way class 4 cycle track along Gilman Drive, is designed to link existing bike trails from Oceanside to San Diego, promoting safer and more convenient cycling routes.

City staff presented the project details, highlighting that six property owners are affected, with negotiations successfully concluded with four. However, two property owners, identified as Robinson Wood and Lottermilk, have not reached an agreement with the city regarding the necessary easements for the project. The city seeks to acquire these easements through eminent domain, which requires a two-thirds majority approval from the council.

During the meeting, property owner Rebecca Robinson Wood expressed strong opposition to the eminent domain action, arguing that the proposed compensation was significantly lower than the market value of her land. She claimed that the city’s offer of $135,000 for slope easements was inadequate compared to an independent appraisal valuing her property at $700,000. Wood emphasized the emotional and financial toll the situation has taken on her, stating that the loss of her property would render it unbuildable and impose ongoing tax liabilities.

Public comments reflected a mix of support and concern regarding the project. Some speakers criticized the city’s prioritization of bike lanes over pressing community needs, such as health and safety infrastructure. Others echoed Wood's sentiments, questioning the fairness of the compensation offered and the broader implications of using eminent domain for such projects.

Council members acknowledged the complexities of the situation, emphasizing the importance of balancing public interests with the rights of property owners. They affirmed their commitment to continue negotiations with the affected property owners while moving forward with the resolution of necessity to ensure the timely progression of the Coastal Rail Trail project.

The council ultimately voted in favor of the resolution, allowing the city to proceed with the eminent domain process, while reiterating their intention to engage in further discussions with the property owners to reach a fair resolution.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal