In a recent government meeting, concerns were raised regarding the revival of the Old Town Business Improvement District (BID) proposal, which had been dormant for a year. Critics expressed frustration over the city’s decision to change the rules midstream, allowing the proposal to move forward without additional public hearings. They argued that this approach undermines democratic processes, particularly as the required support threshold was lowered for the Old Town Business Association to advance the bid.

One speaker highlighted the importance of providing a clear voting option for residents, suggesting that ballots should include an option to abstain, ensuring that those uncertain about their vote can still participate. The speaker emphasized the need for anonymous voting to prevent undue pressure from peers, likening the situation to the upcoming elections where privacy is paramount.

Concerns were also voiced about the potential economic impact of a proposed 10-cent tax on properties within the district. Local business owners, some of whom have operated in Old Town for decades, fear that the added tax could lead to increased rents and threaten the viability of long-standing establishments. The speaker urged the council to consider the long-term consequences of the tax on the unique character of Old Town, questioning whether smaller businesses could survive under the new financial burden.

Another speaker, Dan Hazelwood, reflected on his long history with the Old Town BID discussions, recalling his previous opposition to the initiative seven years ago. He reiterated the need for careful consideration of policies that could affect the community if the BID is reinstated.

The meeting underscored the ongoing debate surrounding the Old Town BID, with community members advocating for transparency and careful deliberation as the council moves forward with the proposal.