During a recent government meeting, council members engaged in a robust discussion regarding the proposed architectural and engineering services for a library project, highlighting concerns over costs and community involvement in design decisions.

One council member reflected on the library's previous remodel in 2006, expressing surprise at the unexpected green color of the building and emphasizing the need for better community feedback in future projects. They proposed a more interactive approach, suggesting that design concepts be shared with the community before construction begins to ensure that the final product reflects local preferences.

Another council member voiced strong support for the library but expressed frustration over the high costs associated with architectural services. They specifically criticized a proposed 12% administrative markup amounting to $81,414, questioning the necessity of such fees given the substantial subcontracting costs already included in the proposal. This sentiment resonated with other members, who echoed concerns about the rising costs of engineering services across the board.

City Manager Chamberlain clarified that the contract structure allows for payment based on actual hours worked, up to a specified limit, which aims to provide transparency and accountability in billing. However, questions remained about how hours would be tracked and verified.

Despite the concerns raised, several council members reiterated their commitment to the library project, acknowledging the importance of quality services while balancing budgetary constraints. The discussion concluded with a motion to pass the resolution, reflecting a consensus on the project's value despite the ongoing concerns about costs.