Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Public Outcry Over Proposed Aggregate Mining Project

June 11, 2024 | Rice County, Minnesota



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Public Outcry Over Proposed Aggregate Mining Project
In a recent government meeting, the Rice County Board discussed the proposed aggregate mining project by Milestone Materials in Northfield Township, which has sparked significant public interest and concern. The Planning Commission had previously recommended approval of the project with 18 conditions, but the County Board postponed the decision to allow for further public hearings and additional environmental assessments.

The project, which involves mining approximately 12 to 14 acres, does not meet the mandatory threshold for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW), which typically applies to projects exceeding 40 acres or a depth of 10 feet. However, a citizen petition for a discretionary EAW was submitted, prompting the board to consider whether to order an EAW based on environmental concerns raised by the community.

Key issues highlighted in the discussions included potential water contamination, impacts on local wildlife, air quality, and increased truck traffic. The board received an independent review from Bolton and Mink, which concluded that the proposed operations are expected to have minimal environmental impacts. They noted that the mining would not involve dewatering and that existing wells are sufficiently deep to avoid contamination.

Public comments during the meeting reflected a divide among community members. Supporters of the project emphasized the need for locally sourced aggregate materials to support infrastructure development, arguing that the project would ultimately enhance property values and restore the site into a usable water body. Conversely, opponents raised concerns about the ecological integrity of the Big Woods Corridor, potential disruptions to wildlife habitats, and the long-term implications of mining in the area.

The board is expected to make a decision on the EAW petition soon, with the possibility of extending the review period if necessary. The outcome will significantly impact the future of the proposed mining operations and the surrounding environment.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI