In a recent government meeting, officials discussed a contentious proposal regarding the construction of a modular home on a property that does not meet the required five-acre minimum for such structures. The previous community development director had suggested rezoning the area to R-4, which allows for manufactured homes, but concerns were raised about the appropriateness of this designation given the surrounding land use.

The property in question is currently classified as R-1, which is designated for low-density single-family homes. Local residents expressed strong opposition to the idea of a modular home being built, citing concerns about property values and neighborhood aesthetics. One resident, Tracy Powell, voiced her frustration, stating that mobile homes should not be permitted within city limits and highlighted a history of miscommunication regarding the property’s zoning status.

The discussion revealed that the land has changed ownership multiple times and that previous owners had lived in an RV on the site. Powell emphasized that the land's location near a creek complicates any potential construction, making it impractical for building a home.

As the meeting progressed, officials debated the merits of recommending R-1 zoning, which aligns with the future land use plan for the area. However, some members expressed hesitation to make a recommendation without further consultation with the property owner. Ultimately, a motion was made to deny the request for R-4 zoning, reflecting the community's concerns and the challenges posed by the land's characteristics. The outcome of this discussion will likely influence future decisions regarding land use and development in the area.