During a recent city council meeting, members engaged in a heated discussion regarding the proposed resolution 2024-34, which seeks to condemn the actions of a former council member. The mayor initiated a motion to table the resolution until the next meeting, scheduled for September 3rd, to allow for consultation with the city attorney about potential liability issues. The mayor expressed concerns that pursuing actions against a former member could set a troubling precedent for future councils.

Council member Schaeffer supported the motion, emphasizing the need for legal clarity before proceeding. However, another council member countered that the resolution was primarily a political action, akin to a censure, and did not require legal review. This member argued that the resolution merely condemns actions rather than the individual, asserting that the factual basis for the resolution is sound.

Despite the discussion, the motion to defer the resolution failed with a vote of 1 to 5, allowing the council to continue deliberating on the resolution itself. The mayor also noted that citizens had previously expressed a desire for more information on council decorum, referencing a workshop held in 2018 with the Michigan Municipal League aimed at improving council conduct.

The council's decision to move forward with the resolution without legal consultation has raised questions about the implications of condemning actions of former officials and the potential impact on future governance.