During a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the current burden of proof requirement in the ethics process, which some members believe deters citizen participation. One board member expressed strong opposition to the burden of proof, arguing that it \"weaponizes\" the ethics code against citizens who might consider filing complaints. This sentiment was echoed by another member, who stated that the board would be rendered ineffective if the burden of proof remained in place.

The discussion highlighted a growing frustration among board members, who feel that the requirement not only complicates the ethics process but also discourages community engagement. One member emphasized the need for the issue to be prioritized in discussions with the council, suggesting that if the burden of proof is not eliminated, the board's purpose would be undermined.

The board is considering taking action to address this issue, with plans to propose a discussion at an upcoming work session. Members are eager to see a resolution that would allow for a more accessible and effective ethics process, reflecting their commitment to serving the community without the fear of personal repercussions.