In a recent government meeting, officials expressed frustration over the lack of constructive feedback from city council members regarding proposed code amendments. Participants noted that many suggestions were left unaddressed, with council members appearing to focus on unrelated issues during discussions. One official likened the council's response to offering a \"bone\" instead of the \"filet\" they were seeking, indicating dissatisfaction with the minimal engagement on critical points.

The dialogue highlighted a desire for a more collaborative approach, with officials suggesting that the council should present their preferences clearly rather than simply rejecting proposals. There was a consensus that the existing code, which has been in place since 2012, should not be completely overhauled but rather refined based on specific concerns raised by the council.

Several officials advocated for a face-to-face meeting with the city council to facilitate open communication and clarify expectations. They emphasized the importance of addressing the constituents' needs and ensuring that their voices are heard in the decision-making process. The tone of the meeting reflected a growing frustration with perceived inefficiencies and a lack of decorum during council sessions, which some described as chaotic and unproductive.

Legal considerations were also discussed, with questions raised about the governing body's authority to address these issues effectively. The officials expressed a commitment to revising their proposals while maintaining the integrity of their original work, urging the council to engage in meaningful dialogue rather than dismissing their efforts outright.

Overall, the meeting underscored a critical need for improved communication and collaboration between city officials and the council to ensure that the governance process is transparent and responsive to the community's needs.