In a recent government meeting, the planning commission discussed two significant rezoning requests that could reshape local neighborhoods.
The first request, presented by Kyle Griffin, seeks to rezone a 3.53-acre property at 8286 Rocky Fork Amelville Road from R3 to Planned Residential Development (PRD). The proposal includes the development of seven single-family lots, with one existing home remaining on the site. The surrounding area features a mix of R3 and PRD zoning, and the land use plan supports medium-density residential development. The commission noted that the developer plans to enhance the aesthetic quality of the homes, committing to a minimum of 75% brick or stone on all sides and square footage ranging from 2,400 to 3,600 square feet.
Concerns were raised regarding privacy for existing residents adjacent to the new development. In response, the commission suggested implementing a buffer, such as evergreen trees or fencing, to mitigate potential disturbances. The motion to approve the rezoning, along with the proposed buffer, passed unanimously.
The second request involved Eduardo Moreno's property at 11514 Old Nashville Highway, which is currently zoned R2 and is proposed to be rezoned to Professional Office (P&O). This change would allow the existing house to be converted into an office space. The commission expressed concerns about the impact on the surrounding residential neighborhood, particularly regarding traffic and the potential for further commercial encroachment. Ultimately, the motion to approve the rezoning was denied due to concerns about maintaining the character of the area.
Lastly, Rob Molchan presented a request to rezone 6.78 acres on Gamble Lane from R1 to PRD, proposing 22 lots instead of the initially planned 24. The commission discussed the necessity of a new collector street to connect to adjacent properties and addressed stormwater management concerns. The developer assured that all regulations would be met, including maintaining existing natural features. The commission is expected to continue deliberating on this request in future meetings.
These discussions highlight the ongoing balancing act between development and community preservation as local officials navigate the complexities of zoning regulations and neighborhood dynamics.