In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a proposed 173-foot self-supporting tower intended for DISH Wireless, which has sparked significant local opposition. The tower is designed to accommodate three additional wireless carriers and is strategically placed to minimize its impact on productive farmland while adhering to safety setbacks.

Proponents of the tower highlighted its potential to enhance wireless coverage in the area, particularly as the surrounding community grows. They emphasized that the tower's location near a conservancy lot was chosen to address public safety concerns and to facilitate better connectivity for residents and visitors engaging in outdoor activities.

However, local resident Tom Glaser voiced strong objections, arguing that the tower contradicts the town's previous commitment to preserving green space and rural character. He expressed concerns about the visual impact of the tower on the landscape, particularly for those who frequent the area for recreation. Glaser urged the committee to reconsider the location, suggesting that alternative sites within the nearby Village of McFarland would be more appropriate.

The committee acknowledged the opposition and decided to postpone the decision on the tower's construction to allow for further discussion and consideration of community concerns. The motion to postpone was passed unanimously, indicating a willingness to engage with residents and explore potential compromises before moving forward with the project. The matter will be revisited in the next meeting, as stakeholders continue to weigh the benefits of improved wireless service against the preservation of local aesthetics and community values.