In a recent government meeting, concerns surrounding Enbridge's proposed tunnel project and its implications for local communities and the environment were at the forefront of discussions. Critics voiced strong opposition to the project, arguing that it poses significant risks to the Great Lakes and local ecosystems, while also perpetuating social issues such as human trafficking.

One speaker highlighted that while Enbridge contributes financially to local initiatives, the costs ultimately fall on taxpayers, framing these contributions as public relations efforts rather than genuine community support. The speaker emphasized that Enbridge's threats to withdraw propane supplies from Northern Michigan if Line 5 is shut down are unfounded, asserting that local businesses could easily fill the gap.

Further allegations were made regarding Enbridge's history, including claims of employee involvement in human trafficking during the construction of Line 3. This raised alarms about the potential for similar issues arising from the new tunnel project, which critics argue could facilitate further trafficking activities.

Another participant, Monica Katie, expressed deep concern over the environmental impact of the tunnel, fearing it could lead to pollution of the Great Lakes and disrupt local water supplies. She also warned that the influx of out-of-town workers could exacerbate social issues, including drug trafficking and violence against Indigenous communities.

Katie, who has a background in environmental studies, called for a halt to the project, citing the need for clean water and the preservation of Indigenous lifeways. She criticized the state’s previous handling of environmental crises, referencing the Flint water crisis as a cautionary tale against trusting Enbridge's assurances.

The meeting underscored a growing sentiment among community members and local leaders who are calling for the decommissioning of Line 5 and a reevaluation of the proposed tunnel project. As discussions continue, the future of the Great Lakes and the well-being of local residents remain at the center of this contentious issue.