In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a proposed development on a 75-acre farm, which includes equestrian facilities and agricultural activities. The developer emphasized that the project aims to create a luxury equestrian experience while maintaining the agricultural integrity of the land. Currently zoned for one house per acre, the developer is seeking permission to reduce the lot size to accommodate fewer homes, arguing that this would allow for a more feasible project given the challenges posed by the floodplain.

The developer clarified that no fill has been brought into the floodplain area, asserting that the land's topography limits development options. He expressed concerns that adhering to the current zoning would restrict the project to only ten homes, making it economically unviable. The developer's request is framed as a reduction in density, seeking to build less than one-third of the potential homes allowed under existing zoning regulations.

Commissioners raised concerns regarding the land disturbance, noting reports of numerous dump trucks delivering fill dirt to the site without a permit. The developer acknowledged that most work had been conducted under the premise of agricultural use, but questions remained about the legality of the fill operations. A representative from Greenlight, the consulting firm involved, stated that they were not responsible for the fill dirt placed prior to their engagement and confirmed that a flood study is underway to address community concerns.

The meeting highlighted the tension between development aspirations and regulatory compliance, with commissioners seeking assurance that the project would not exacerbate flooding issues or lead to unauthorized land use changes. The developer's commitment to working within the existing agricultural framework was reiterated, as he aims to balance development needs with environmental considerations.