During a recent government meeting, frustrations were voiced regarding ongoing obstruction tactics affecting the Human Rights Commission (HRC). A member expressed disappointment that, three years later, similar issues persist, attributing the obstruction to staff and specifically to John Barr. The speaker acknowledged the hard work of the city clerk's office but emphasized that obstructing democratic processes undermines their efforts.

The member urged that it is within the commission's rights to forward matters to the city council, suggesting that if obstruction continues, they should bypass it by securing support from two council members to add items to the agenda. This call to action reflects a growing impatience with the current situation.

Furthermore, the speaker indicated plans to discuss these concerns with the city manager and suggested that John Barr should consider stepping down, especially as his contract is up for renewal this year. The member highlighted that legal interpretations can vary and criticized the consistent trend of obstruction attributed to Barr's legal advice. This meeting underscores a critical moment for the HRC as it navigates internal challenges and seeks to fulfill its mandate effectively.