During a recent city council meeting, discussions centered on the contentious police contract negotiations, with community advocates urging council members to reject a tentative agreement and send it back to mediation. Advocates from the Minneapolis for Better Police Contract group expressed frustration over the perceived lack of transparency and fairness in the bargaining process, likening it to a game of \"keep away\" where essential issues are sidelined.

One speaker highlighted the disparity between wage increases and benefits, stating that the current proposal does not align with community standards. They emphasized the need for the contract to be a viable tool for reform, arguing that the existing framework has not been effectively utilized. The speaker called for a rejection of the current contract, advocating for a return to mediation to allow for improvements.

The meeting also featured moments of tension, with council members reminding each other to adhere to procedural norms and time limits during presentations. Council members expressed appreciation for public engagement and indicated a willingness to hear diverse perspectives on the contract in future sessions.

As the meeting transitioned to public comments, community members were invited to share their views, underscoring the importance of public input in the decision-making process. The council's approach to the police contract remains a focal point of community concern, reflecting broader discussions about police reform and accountability in Minneapolis.