During a recent government meeting, Phil Struble raised significant concerns regarding the density calculations outlined in the draft zoning code. Struble highlighted discrepancies between the minimum lot sizes presented in earlier discussions and the proposed regulations, specifically noting that the minimum lot size for R1 zoning has been reduced to 5,000 square feet, while the draft document suggests a minimum of 10,000 square feet.

Struble argued that density should not be solely tied to lot size but rather reflect the overall development potential of a parcel. He criticized the example provided in the draft, which suggested that a 12,000 square foot parcel could only accommodate one house, calling it unhelpful and counterproductive to the goal of increasing affordable housing. He urged the commission to eliminate the density requirements for R1 and R2 zones, asserting that existing minimum lot sizes should suffice to guide development.

The discussion also touched on the implications of maintaining minimum and maximum density requirements. Some commissioners questioned the necessity of the R1 zoning category in light of the community's push for increased density. They expressed concerns about potential equity issues, noting that larger, more expensive lots are exempt from density requirements, while smaller lots are not.

Elizabeth, a city planner, defended the inclusion of density minimums and maximums, stating that they align with the community's long-term planning goals to increase density in Lawrence. She emphasized that the intent is to encourage diverse housing options and adapt to market demands.

The meeting concluded with a recognition of the complexities surrounding density calculations and zoning regulations, as commissioners and public participants grappled with balancing development needs, market realities, and community character. The ongoing dialogue reflects a broader effort to refine zoning codes to better serve the evolving needs of Lawrence's residents.