In a recent government meeting, community members expressed strong opposition to a proposed rezoning project at 97th and Metcalf, which seeks to allow RP-6 zoning adjacent to R-1 residential properties. The council had previously voted against the rezoning, with residents citing concerns over the impact on their neighborhoods and adherence to existing zoning ordinances.

During the meeting, residents highlighted the lack of precedent for such zoning changes, questioning whether Glenwood homeowners were being unfairly targeted. One speaker noted that they could not find any other instances of RP-6 zoning adjacent to R-1 properties in Overland Park, suggesting that the proposed development could set a troubling precedent.

Shelley Lewis, a long-time resident, emphasized the importance of following city ordinances that prohibit R-1 residential areas from being next to RP-6 zones. She referenced a Kansas Court of Appeals ruling that supports the council's decision to disapprove the rezoning, stating that the council's responsibilities were fulfilled with the valid protest petition filed by residents.

Lewis also criticized council members for their perceived willingness to continue discussions with the developer despite the disapproval, arguing that it undermines the existing zoning laws. She proposed a series of recommendations for the development, including reducing the height of buildings, improving landscaping, and enhancing the overall aesthetic to better fit the community.

Another resident, Ashley Shaw, echoed these sentiments, expressing disappointment in council members who voted in favor of the project. She urged the council to consider alternative developments that would better serve the community's needs, such as townhomes or facilities for the elderly.

The meeting underscored a growing community engagement as residents voiced their concerns and willingness to collaborate with developers, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the character of their neighborhoods while addressing the need for new developments. The council's next steps remain uncertain, but the residents' active participation signals a strong commitment to preserving their community's integrity.