Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

City Council Approves Major Opioid Settlement Amid Controversy

July 02, 2024 | Alameda , Alameda County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City Council Approves Major Opioid Settlement Amid Controversy
During the City of Alameda City Council meeting on July 2, 2024, key discussions centered around the approval of a consent calendar and the ongoing opioid litigation settlement. The meeting began with a roll call, confirming the presence of council members, including Vice Mayor Dacen and Mayor Esi Ashcraft, while Council Member Veil participated remotely.

The council addressed routine items on the consent calendar, which included designating negotiators for two properties: 390 West Orinsky and 2440 Monarch Street. A notable point of contention arose regarding item 2B, which involved negotiations with Steeltown Winery. Council Member Harris Spencer proposed adding the city attorney, Evan Chen, to the negotiating team, citing a request from Steeltown for his expertise. However, some council members expressed concerns about allowing a negotiating party to influence the selection of negotiators, leading to a failed motion to amend the team.

Following the consent calendar, the council moved into closed session to discuss various litigation matters, including a significant opioid litigation case against Kroger and regional pharmacies. The settlement could yield up to $1.2 billion, with Alameda's share estimated at approximately $59,000 over 11 years. The council authorized the city attorney to participate in the settlement, which aims to address opioid abatement efforts.

The meeting concluded with a reminder for public comments on closed session items, although none were presented. The council then adjourned to continue discussions in closed session, with plans to reconvene for the regular meeting later in the evening.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal