During a recent city council meeting, community members voiced strong opposition to a proposed increase in the Austin Police Department's (APD) budget, advocating instead for a reallocation of funds to the Community Investment Budget (CIB). The proposed increase of $18.2 million for the police budget, which would bring the total to approximately $496.3 million, was met with criticism as speakers highlighted the disproportionate allocation of resources, with the CIB representing only 5.7% of the general fund at $79.5 million.

Advocates for the CIB argued that the police department currently holds tens of millions of dollars in unfilled positions, suggesting that the funds earmarked for these vacancies could be better utilized to support community programs. They emphasized the need for long-term solutions that prioritize workforce development, mental health services, and violence intervention programs, rather than temporary fixes that contribute to a bloated police budget.

One speaker, Carolyn Soames, shared a personal experience that underscored the need for alternative first response programs, stating that her interaction with police during a crisis was distressing and unhelpful. She called for a shift away from traditional policing methods towards more equitable and effective community safety strategies.

Chris Harris from the Austin Justice Coalition criticized the council for responding to calls for increased police funding without addressing the underlying issues within the department. He pointed out that despite previous raises and bonuses, the APD continues to struggle with staffing and community relations. Harris urged the council to redirect funds from the police budget to support essential services that enhance community health and safety, such as housing, food sustainability, and alternative response initiatives.

The meeting highlighted a growing sentiment among community members that investing in social services and community programs is crucial for fostering a safer and more equitable Austin, rather than continuing to increase funding for a police department facing significant challenges.