Investigation reveals gaps in DUI crash response

In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the investigation of a fatal crash involving an impaired driver. Commissioner Ryan highlighted the seriousness of the incident, which included fatalities and alcohol involvement. The inquiry raised questions about the driver’s use of prescription medications, specifically two empty pill bottles found at the crash scene.

During the meeting, it was revealed that the driver had not been questioned about the pills, as the responding officer, a Drug Recognition Expert (DRE), noted that the bottles lacked labels and were empty. This led to confusion regarding the officer's decision to consult a paramedic about the potential effects of the contents of the bottles, despite being trained to assess such situations independently.

The discussion also clarified that the driver was not involved in a subsequent crash after being released from the hospital, as initially suggested. Instead, the officer confirmed that there were two separate incidents, and the driver was charged with DUI related to the first crash.

The meeting concluded with a motion by Commissioner Jefferson to disapprove a decertification recommendation for an officer involved in the case, which was seconded and passed without opposition. The officer in question, David A. Schenck, had been on probation and had completed an extensive training program, although he ranked last among his peers during training.

The meeting underscored the importance of thorough investigations and accountability within law enforcement, particularly in cases involving impaired driving and public safety.