In a recent city council meeting, the former city auditor of Ontario, who was terminated following a series of allegations, detailed the circumstances surrounding his dismissal. The auditor, who spoke during public comment, claimed that his termination stemmed from his adherence to professional audit standards and his refusal to comply with directives he deemed inappropriate.

The auditor recounted receiving an email from Jordan Vilwalk, which he argued violated established audit standards. He emphasized his obligation to follow the ethical guidelines set forth by the Institute of Internal Auditors and the standards established by Scott Ochoa, the city’s audit standards authority. He stated that after raising concerns about the directive to the internal audit committee, he was placed on paid administrative leave just hours later.

He outlined that the allegations against him included claims of dishonesty, exceeding authority, and insubordination, all of which he vehemently denied. He argued that his actions, including conducting investigations into fraud, waste, and abuse, were within the scope of his job description and responsibilities as city auditor. He criticized the city’s claims as “absurd,” asserting that his commitment to professional standards was mischaracterized as insubordination.

The auditor's comments raised questions about the internal processes of the city’s auditing practices and the implications of his termination for accountability within the city government. The council members listened but did not engage in discussion during the public comment period, adhering to procedural rules. The situation highlights ongoing tensions regarding governance and oversight in the city of Ontario.