In a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding rail safety, particularly in light of the increasing lengths of freight trains and their implications for public safety. Ray Vigil, a locomotive engineer and chairman of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, highlighted a troubling incident where a lengthy train blocked public crossings during a fireworks event, nearly leading to a dangerous situation involving families trying to access the waterfront.

Vigil emphasized that the current Precision Scheduled Railroading (PSR) model has resulted in trains stretching up to 2-3 miles long, which poses serious risks, including prolonged blockage of road crossings that can hinder emergency response times. He advocated for legislation that would limit train lengths to 8,500 feet and require two certified crew members on hazardous materials trains, arguing that this would enhance safety for both communities and railroad workers.

The discussion also touched on the need for improved emergency response protocols, especially in light of past incidents like the East Palestine derailment, which underscored the potential dangers of transporting hazardous materials through densely populated areas. Vigil and other advocates stressed that having two crew members on board is crucial for effective emergency management, as it allows for quicker responses to incidents and better coordination with first responders.

Several committee members expressed support for the proposed safety measures, noting that the average length of freight trains has increased significantly, with some exceeding a mile and a half. They pointed out that longer trains not only complicate emergency responses but also pose risks to public safety, especially in urban settings where crossings are frequent.

Opposition to the bill was voiced by Art Batsby, a professional engineer, who argued that the legislation does not adequately address the risks posed by non-hazardous materials and passenger trains. He called for a more comprehensive safety bill that includes stricter regulations on train inspections and the placement of wayside detectors to prevent derailments.

The meeting concluded with a consensus on the need for legislative action to enhance rail safety, with advocates urging lawmakers to prioritize public safety and community well-being in their decision-making processes. The proposed bill aims to establish essential safety measures that could prevent future disasters and ensure a more secure rail system for New Jersey residents.