Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

City Council Approves Controversial Signage Enforcement Amendments

August 05, 2024 | Conway, Horry County, South Carolina



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City Council Approves Controversial Signage Enforcement Amendments
During a recent government meeting, the planning commission recommended approval of amendments to the City of Common Unified Development Ordinance, specifically concerning signage regulations and enforcement measures. The amendments, which were discussed in a public hearing on July 11, aim to address the placement of signs on public property and within public rights-of-way.

The proposed changes include a provision that classifies each violation of the signage ordinance as a civil infraction, subject to a $50 fine. Additionally, city staff will be authorized to remove and discard signs that violate the ordinance. However, concerns were raised regarding the enforcement of these penalties, particularly since planning and zoning officials lack the authority to issue summonses for civil infractions. The staff clarified that while violations of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) are typically classified as misdemeanors, the amendments would specify certain infractions as civil, allowing for a more streamlined enforcement process.

Council members engaged in a discussion about the implications of the new fines, particularly in cases of multiple signs being placed in violation of the ordinance. It was noted that each sign could potentially be treated as a separate offense, leading to cumulative fines for repeat offenders. The council emphasized the need for clear enforcement guidelines to prevent misuse of the ordinance, particularly in politically charged situations where signs might be placed by opponents.

In addition to the signage amendments, the council also addressed a request to close and abandon an unimproved private alley. The applicant, whose properties were annexed last year, is seeking to redevelop the site, necessitating the abandonment of the alley. The council confirmed that the applicant had followed the necessary legal procedures for the closure, and staff recommended approval of the request.

Both measures received unanimous support from the council, reflecting a commitment to maintaining orderly development and enforcement within the community.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting