In a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the implications of proposed legislation affecting extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) residents in Southport. The discussions highlighted the unique position of ETJ residents, who do not have voting rights in local elections yet benefit from city amenities without contributing to city taxes. This situation has sparked a debate about the fairness and representation of ETJ residents in local governance.

Representative Miller and Ms. Sykes presented a petition with 301 signatures advocating for the removal of oversight and protections for the ETJ by Southport. This move has been met with resistance from local officials who argue that such changes could lead to unregulated development, potentially harming the community's cohesion and environmental integrity. Concerns were specifically raised about the lack of a comprehensive plan for the ETJ, especially in light of recent developments that have seen significant tree removal and environmental degradation.

The ongoing revision of Southport's comprehensive plan aims to include the ETJ in future planning efforts, contrasting with Brunswick County's recent plan, which failed to address the ETJ's needs. Local officials expressed alarm over the potential consequences of legislation that would empower county standards over local regulations, particularly regarding environmental protections like tree ordinances.

The meeting underscored a growing frustration with the perceived prioritization of development interests over community well-being. Officials urged residents to engage with their representatives as the legislation progresses through the Senate, emphasizing the importance of collective action to safeguard the interests of all community members, not just a select few.