During a recent government meeting, community members voiced strong opposition to a proposed lease for a property known as the epicenter, citing significant concerns regarding zoning, transparency, and community involvement. The lease, which would grant the county control over the property for 45 years, has raised alarms among residents who argue that the land should be designated as parkland to prevent commercial use.

Key issues highlighted include the property's ambiguous zoning status, which is listed as both commercial and open space. Residents expressed frustration over the lack of clarity regarding the zoning designations—CC3-8 and OP1-1—and the potential implications for future land use. They emphasized that without a clear designation as parkland, the property could be subject to inappropriate developments, particularly given its proximity to a senior center and other parklands.

Community members also criticized the process leading to the lease agreement, claiming that it lacked adequate public engagement. While the county held numerous public hearings, residents felt sidelined, with only one planning group meeting conducted by the city. Many argued that the community had not been given sufficient opportunity to review the lease details or voice their concerns, which they believe undermines the principles of transparency and inclusion.

Concerns were raised about the proposed rehabilitation of the building, with residents questioning the vagueness of the operational plans and the potential for construction to disrupt access to the senior center. The presence of asbestos in the building further complicates matters, as residents seek assurances regarding remediation and safety measures.

Several speakers called for the city to conduct environmental impact assessments and to ensure that the epicenter is officially designated as parkland. They urged city officials to prioritize community input and to avoid rushing the process, especially given the property's long history of neglect.

Overall, the meeting underscored a growing demand for accountability and community involvement in decisions that affect local resources, with residents insisting that their voices must be heard in shaping the future of the epicenter.