Residents of Ewing Street voiced significant concerns during a recent government meeting regarding a proposed subdivision at 469 Ewing Street, which aims to transform a single-family home into four separate units. The discussions highlighted issues related to traffic, parking, and neighborhood character, reflecting a broader apprehension about the implications of increased density in the area.

One resident expressed gratitude for the newly installed sidewalk but raised alarms about the street's narrowness and the insufficient number of parking spaces—only six designated spots for a development that could potentially house multiple vehicles. This concern was echoed by others, who noted that the existing traffic conditions are already strained, particularly with school buses and service vehicles navigating the tight street.

Michael Bell, a local resident, criticized the proposal for ignoring existing zoning laws and warned that it could set a precedent for further developments that might compromise the community's character. He emphasized the potential negative impact on local infrastructure, particularly regarding shared driveways and parking conflicts among residents.

His wife, Jane McCarty, added that the proposed lots are below the required size for the zoning district, arguing that creating more nonconforming lots would exacerbate existing issues. She questioned the rationale behind the variance requests and expressed concern about the potential increase in traffic and parking challenges on Ewing Street.

Support for the development was also voiced, with some residents arguing that the design could provide a necessary housing option amid a growing housing crisis. They suggested that not all residents would rely on cars, as biking and walking could remain viable alternatives in the neighborhood.

The meeting underscored a community divided on the issue, with many residents advocating for careful consideration of how such developments could alter the fabric of their neighborhood. As discussions continue, the board faces the challenge of balancing the need for housing with the preservation of community character and safety.