Hearing reveals troubling past of pardon applicants

In a recent government meeting, the board reviewed several petitions for pardons, resulting in significant discussions regarding the backgrounds and behaviors of the applicants.

The first petitioner, Michael David Calendar, was unanimously approved for a full hearing, with no objections raised by board members. This decision indicates a willingness to explore his case further.

Antonio Vassi Chambly, junior, was the next applicant discussed. Chambly has a history of criminal convictions, including a serious strangulation incident in 2017, for which he served five years and completed probation in 2019. Despite a recent termination from his job due to alleged misconduct, board members expressed mixed feelings about his readiness for a pardon. While one member noted his participation in required programming and a supportive letter from his wife, another raised concerns about his anger issues and the gap between his convictions. Ultimately, the board voted to bring him forward for a full hearing, with a majority in favor.

The final case involved Rashawn Lamont Daniels, whose criminal history includes firearms offenses and negligent homicide. Board members expressed serious concerns about his behavior, particularly following a pedestrian incident. Despite having a stable job, the board unanimously decided to deny his request for a pardon, citing the severity of his offenses and his criminal history as primary reasons.

The meeting highlighted the board's careful consideration of each case, balancing the potential for rehabilitation against the seriousness of past offenses.