Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

County leaders clash over election transparency and machine voting

August 01, 2024 | Fall River County, South Dakota



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

County leaders clash over election transparency and machine voting
During a recent government meeting in Fall River County, significant discussions centered around the contentious issue of election transparency and the future of the county jail.

One of the primary topics was the community's demand for hand-counted ballots instead of machine counts. A recent poll indicated that a substantial majority of local voters—50% of Democrats, 60% of independents, and 80% of Republicans—expressed concerns regarding the transparency of voting machines. Residents voiced their desire for hand counting, with many stating they would take action to ensure it happens. The sentiment was echoed by several board members, who noted that no citizens had advocated for machine counting, raising questions about the integrity of the current voting process.

The discussion also highlighted the board's decision to conduct a 100% audit of machine counts after elections, with repercussions if discrepancies exceed 2%. This decision was met with mixed reactions, as some members argued that a recount would not address the same concerns as a hand count.

In addition to election matters, the meeting addressed the ongoing challenges surrounding the county jail. Officials are awaiting confirmation from engineers regarding the possibility of securing a 4% loan for construction. If the loan is not approved, the board will need to consider alternative financing options or purchasing land for a new facility.

As the meeting concluded, the board moved into an executive session to discuss personnel and contractual negotiations, indicating ongoing efforts to address the county's pressing issues. The discussions reflect a community grappling with transparency in governance and the need for infrastructure improvements amidst rising concerns about public safety and accountability.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting