In a recent government meeting, concerns were raised regarding a proposed variance that could allow for the construction of two homes on properties adjacent to a wetland area. A local resident expressed significant worries about potential water runoff issues that could arise from the development, particularly as their property is situated downhill from the proposed sites.

The resident detailed their experience with water mitigation measures mandated by the state environmental protection agency when they purchased their home. They emphasized that any increase in density from the new homes could exacerbate existing water runoff problems, including septic, driveway, and stormwater runoff, which could negatively impact their property and the surrounding wetland.

The discussion also touched on the specifics of the parcels involved in the variance request, noting that the triangular plots below the main properties currently have different land use codes and are deemed unbuildable. The resident questioned the rules governing the merging of these parcels to meet the required square footage for development.

Board members acknowledged the resident's concerns but clarified that the zoning board's role is primarily focused on dimensions and variances, while issues related to water management would fall under the planning board's jurisdiction. They assured the resident that their concerns would be taken into account, but reiterated that the zoning board could not make decisions based on potential future problems.

The meeting highlighted the complexities of local zoning laws and the importance of considering environmental impacts in development decisions. Residents were informed that if the variance is granted, there would be a 20-day appeal period during which they could contest the decision before it moves to the planning board for further review. The ongoing dialogue underscores the community's commitment to balancing development with environmental stewardship.