Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

County faces backlash over controversial pipeline decision

September 10, 2024 | Santa Barbara County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

County faces backlash over controversial pipeline decision
In a recent Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the Sable Pipeline, which has been under scrutiny since a major oil spill in 2015. Linda Krop, Chief Counsel for the Environmental Defense Center, expressed alarm over the county's recent settlement that seemingly relinquished its authority over the pipeline's operation without public input. Krop highlighted findings from a draft environmental impact report indicating that even with proposed safety measures, the pipeline could still experience annual spills and ruptures every four years, potentially resulting in spills nearly double the size of the 2015 incident.

Krop, along with other speakers, including Hillary Hauser and Noah Boland, called for a public hearing to reassess the county's jurisdiction over the pipeline and to allow for community input on the matter. They emphasized the need for transparency and accountability, arguing that the decision-making process has been conducted behind closed doors, undermining public trust.

Brady Bradshaw from the Center for Biological Diversity echoed these sentiments, urging the board to retract its acknowledgment of federal preemption over the pipeline, asserting that the county retains the authority to regulate local environmental safety.

The meeting also featured public comments on various issues, including allegations of corruption within the county's planning and development departments. Diana Sandoval criticized the board for perceived bias and misconduct in handling her property appeals, calling for an independent investigation into the department's practices.

Additionally, Danielle Lovell raised concerns about the treatment of horses in local facilities, advocating for legal protections to ensure their welfare. Sherry Foster concluded the public comments by addressing election integrity issues, emphasizing the need for compliance with federal regulations.

The discussions highlighted a growing demand for public engagement in environmental and governance matters, reflecting broader concerns about transparency and accountability in local government. The board's next steps regarding the Sable Pipeline and other issues raised during the meeting remain to be seen as community members continue to advocate for their rights and environmental safety.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal